The sermon contnues the plan annunced on the previous day by presenting the punishment for those who do not receive (properly) the eucharist - seven consequences, from the exclusion form the church to the damnation

"De necessaria obligatione sacratissima communionis" Introduction frames the eucharist among the salvific tools provided by the divine providence, and says that having finhished to discuss about the sacrmaent of penance (again, underlining just contrition and confession, without space for satisfation), it is time to discuss about the eucharist by presenting three key points: the necessity (and so the obligation to it); the punishment for the omission; the preparation.    It annunces that only the first point will be discussed in this sermon, the others in the two following sermons.

Introduction It underlines that the current plague is a divine punishment for sins that the preacher wants to expose, so that the people correct themselves: «In presenti sermone volo vobis ostendere et declarare aliqua gravia peccata propter que deus est iratus conta nos. Ideo mittit ista tribulationes pestilentiarum mortalitatum per mundum. Ut ergo ista peccata corrigantur et cesset ista plaga volo nunc ista peccata declarare” (f. p1v).  A taxonomy of sin: against the neighbour are iniquitates; against the body (debauchery, lust, sloth) are peccata (“i.e. pecorum acta secundum ethymologiam [...] acta pecurum”); against the soul are delicta, since they poison and kill the soul, when one does not take care of the soul, which is therefore derelicta; against God (swearing, denying, blasphemy) are scelera. The last typology will be the topic of the sermon. - Sermon structured on Ezekiel 8 (which is not the thema): long account of this vision and moral interpretation of four sins (scelera). - 1) “Hec civitas est christianitas”. The city is founded by Christ, one enters it through the baptism (notation to expand on this: (“Dic modum baptizandi”). The idol in the vision (idolum zeli) symbolizes those who turn to the devil by means of necromancers (divini) when they are in trouble for different reasons: “in nostris necessitatibus recurrimus ad diabolum vel per sanitate habenda, vel per reperdita ad inveniendum, vel per filiis habendis, vel si estis maleficiati statim vaditis ad idolum, scilicet divinum in quo est diabolus...” (f. p2r). Attack against the divini who are traitors who subtract the people from their king, Christ, and bring them to the devil. It recalls that in the Leviticus the pain for necromancers is the lapidation, since the whole people need to get rid of this type of sin. When in a city or state (“in una villa vel patria”) a divinus is welcomed, God sends great tribulations, floods, death (biblical references: the deluge, Saul and the witch of Endor). Political reading: the idol is connect with the divisions in the city and the sin of those who have a political office: “Vel si sit divisio propter regimem. Dic quomodo illud idolum significat domum consilii” (f. p2v). The idolum zeli provokes envy and emulation “in hac villa”. “Omnes laborant ut habeant regimen. Ex quo sequuntur multa mala, invidie, destructiones communitatis, et rancores”. In particular: perjury (when one betrays the oaths pronounced taking the office); thefts (one spends a lot of money to obtain an office, so he wants to recover them – or even worse, he uses for himself the common wealth); damage to the community (compared to a ship). Hence, in public assemblies one must take care of the common good, not of relatives or friends. - 2) The bestial images to which incense is offered symbolize the game of dice (“significat ludum taxillorum; quid sunt taxilli quam imagines bestiarum depicte quibus maiores et seniores dant incensum?”). Complain that once only rogue people played with them, while now also respectable people. The incense is the blasphemy “ex quo peccato veniunt multa mala et plaga mortalitatum”. Exhortation to eliminate this practice, since it is convenient: yes, one loses the gain of a type of taxation, yet it saves his/her soul and his goods from storms (tempestates), “ideo providetis etc”. - 3) Women that cry in front of the idol of Adonis (glossed as the god of love: “secundum poetas deus amoris”; f. p2r) symbolize the mothers who cry and say “multa parola et stulta contra deum” when a young son or daughter dies (the reference seems to death of children), when instead they should rejoice, since God took them while they are still innocent as one would rejoice if a king or a queen had welcomed them at their court. In this way, these women show their lack of hope. Instead, they should cry for their adult sons and daughters, who are headed to Hell due to their sins. - 4) Those who turns their back to the temple and worship towards east symbolize those who work on Sunday and on the feasts, or who spend them in a brothel or inn (“in lupanari vel in taberna”). Since in this way one subtracts the time due to God, the plague subtracts time from him/her: “ista ratione veniunt mortalitates quia ille qui debebat vivere 40 vel 70 annis moritur cras” (f. p3r).

The introduction underlines the spiritual pride of the Greeks. In the first part, discussing of the primacy of the Roman church (and of its orthodoxy), there is also an ample account of the Council of Florence, reporting also its documents (f. p8v-q1r).. The second part presents the history of the divisiones of the Greeks (and their heresis) by finishing the description provided by the previous two sermons. It deals also with the crusade of 1204 and with the recent events, i.e. the fall of Constantinople and the domain of the Turks. Detailed account of the profanation of Constantinople, which is framed as a just divine punishment. Final address: "O greci vani, o superbi, o elati, o maledicentes sedi sancte et obstinati, nonne ultio digna dei venit super vos ut qui obedire renuistis vicario dei iam obediatis spurce genti, intelligite itaque quod initium omnis peccati est superbia ..." (f. q4r). It follows the identification of Constantinople with the fall of Babylon in Revelation 18 and the hope that the surviving Greeks will finally see which is thr true faith.

Introduction Echoing the prophet (thema), the issue is why God allows a people so evil and unfaithful like the Turks to prosper and oppress the Christians: “Ex quo gentem infidelem, impiam et prevaricatricem thurcorum permittit prosperari et christianum populum opprimere?” (f. r5r). Several quotations from Job and Jeremiah. The duration of this oppression surprises the people, who don’t understand its causes; it causes also grumbling about God’s injustice. “Quare licet thurci impii conculcaverunt tuos fideles, devorant, lacerant, et tandiu affligunt? Sunt iam fere anni 870 ab initio secte usque nunc, nec tamen apparet signum consumationis ipsius, de quo nedum multi mirantur tante durationis causam non invenientes, verumetiam plerique murmurant de dei providentia et quissima iusticia” (f. r5r). It's not clear to what the 870 years exactely refer (if it is the Egira, it would refer to 1492 (it would be puzzling); yet later in the sermon, the origin of the Turks is indicated as 666, so it cannot be a reference to it).    Divisio (see above) 

1. Persecution is just since it is a punishment: “Ista christianorum atrox persecutio mahumetica iuste nobis est inflicta propter nostram punitiuonem, quod probemus tripliciter” (f. r5r); the evidences are: a) prophecies, b) reasons, c) revelations. 1.1. Prophecies. In the Bible the prophets announced the persecution of the synagogue – ad fortiori, there are prophecies of the persecutions of the Church. The first and key reference (here and below) is the Pseudo-Methodius. There is first a long series of quotations, which contain vivid and dramatic description of the Muslim violence on Christians. The quotations already contain two key concepts: this is a punishment (castigatio) for the way Christians sinned against the divine law; the persecution will reveal the true faithful (fideles). Attention to geographic description, a sort of geopolitics of history (as in other sermons); see f. r5v.  The cause was a triple separation: from Christ, heresy; from the apostolic seat, disobedience; from Roman empire, rebellion (the reference here is to the Greeks). Interesting reference to the discourse of the Venice orator, Bernardo Giustiniani in front of the pope, as a way to chart (again) the Turkish expansion (in which, stand out the lost of two empires, those of Constantinople  and Trebizond). Cyril’s letter [?], interpreted by Joachim of Fiore’s commentary to the Lamentations: the buck that eats the flash of the sheep symbolizes Muhammad that eats alive the Christians (the flash of Christ, the sheep) who join his sect (secta): “et dentibus suis carnis crudas agnorum dilacerabit, quia parvuli et adulti utriusque sexus relicta fide Chirsti sectam Mahumeti assument” (f. r6r). Reference also to the prophecies of Hildegard of Bingen (with the date 1143) and of Birgitta of Sweden. 1.2. Reasons: justice and sins. With a pessimistic note: while at the time of the martyrs the persecution strengthened the faith, now it decreases it: “In presenti autem afflictione fides non tantum augmentatur, quantum diminuitur, ac maxima blasphemia deo et sanctis eius infertur” (f. b6v). The persecution is due to the crimes of the Christians, mainly three major sins (crimina): “Unde causam huiuscemodi persecutionis ex scripturis inveniemus tria horrenda crimina in ecclesia dei multiplicata sunt”: sodomy (peccatum contra naturam), with references to Letter to Romans and to previous castigations of sodomites: the deluge, the destruction of Sodom, and their death during Christmas night (source Jerome: “et ut dicit Hieronimus: in nocte nativitatis, anteque Christus nasceretur, in hoc peccato laborantes sunt extincti”; f. r7r); ignoble taking of the holy communion, which is labeled as “crimen maximum”, with reference to Thomas Aquinas, since it is “as if one kills Christ”; disobedience, in particular applied to schismatics. 1.3. Sure revelations. Interpretation of Apocalypse 16, the seven bowels (phialae) full of the wrath of God, which represents seven persecutions to the Church. The fifth are the Turks, since the throne of the beast is Constantinople – with a reference to “quodam tractatu disputato in capitulo generali fratrum predicatorum” (f. r7r). The sermon mentions also the vision of a Carthusian in the convent of Raromot (!) in Carniola: in an ecstasy he was brought in front of tribunal of Christ, who asks him why the Church prays so much while instead it has abandoned him. At the announcement of the tribulations that will soon hit the Church, the monk asks two things, which remains without reply: whether also Rome will be conquered by the Turks, and if the faithful will succumb in the spiritual battle: “Demum post modicum resumptis viribus frater de duobus petiit informari a Christo, scilicet: An Rhomana civitas esset a Thurcis capienda; et an in futuro bello, quod in spiritu cognoverat committendum, ipsi fideles succumberentur. Ad que respondit Christus quod non expediret hoc ipsum scire” (f. r7v) Invective against vices, as a way to mention again the main sins.
2. The end of the Turks’ persecution is close [yet, not so close after all] and the sermon deals with two aspects: why it was so long; when it will end. 2.1. The domination was so long due to two reasons: first, as the Postilla of Peter of Burgos points out, they are not idolaters as previous persecutors, so God is less pressured to intervene. It started in the year 666 (symbolism of Revelations), yet “in ista secta mahumetica pessima est infidelitas sine idolatria”; second, they do not directly only to apostate the faith: “nec directe cogunt ad apostatandum a fide” – they just ask to pay a fee, and to pay it does not diminish the dignity of the Church: “Unde vivere abicere et sub iugo servitutis non minuit veritatem ecclesiastice dignitatis” (f. r8r) [a sort of realistic position]; third, they do not recognice the divinity of Christ, yet they appreciate his human qualities – so again God is less compelled to intervene.
   2.2. When will it end? Ample quotation of the Pseudo-Methodius, from which it is derived the number of 56 years, yet without being sure where their start has to be put: “Nescimus tamen unde debent incipi, si a captione Costantinopolitane vel a dominio perfecto grecie” – counting from the fall of Constantinople it would be until 1509, yet it is mentioned – as other possible starting point – the Turkish conquest of Albania (i.e. 1478). Reference to an Islamic prophecy of their own defeat, mentioned by Scotus saying that it was found in a Muslim book in Damietta, which prophesizes that a Christian king will conquer and destroy Mecca and disperse the bons of Muhammad - this will fulfil the promise of the announced of the Gospel in all the word (Matthew 28) and will be end history [cfr. link with the prophecy of the last emperor]. The sermon mentions also the revelations of Hildegard of Bingen, Brigitta of Sweden  and Catherine of Siena who praised preaching to convert the people. Further reference is to Nicholas of Lyra, who refers to the Liber Iudicum ordinariorum a Jewish book of prophesy, connected with the announcement of the raising son of the widow of Zarephath, which states that the world will last 6000 years: 2000 under vanity, 2000 under law, 2000 under the Messiah. Since the period under the Messiah is of 2000 years, and during it the Gospel will be announced to everyone, the end of the Muslim domination should be close [yet, it remains quite an ample margin!]. How it will happen? Again a reference to Pseudo-Methodius: when all seems lost, it will rise “rex christianorum et romanorum”... 3.  There are two reasons why their domination cannot last [sic!]: Muslim usurped the power, conquering it only by means of their weapons; their origin is mean – this is true for Muhammad but even more for the Turks - here there is a long insertion on their history, taken from the Chronicon by Antoninus of Florence – remote link with the history of Troy, their entrance in Persia as people of herders, gradual affirmation, arriving until the conquest of Constantinople in 1453 under Muhammed II.
   Final invocation to God, asking his intervention soon – with a last mention of the prophecy of Pseudo-Methodius about the role of the king of Huns, i.e. now Hungary.