The wife is indeed the vessel of her husband, and conversely, as the Apostle Peter testifies in his First Canonical Epistle (c. 3): “showing honor to the weaker vessel, that is, the wife.” Each of them rightly possesses the vessel of his or her body when it is governed and restrained according to the judgment of right reason. But since the Apostle says in 1 Corinthians 7, “The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband; likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife,” three questions must be raised for clearer explanation.
• First, we ask whether this apostolic statement is to be understood in such a way that each spouse is bound to render the marital debt to the other whenever, however, and at whatever time it is requested […].
• (f. g4v) Second, we ask, on account of the same apostolic statement that the woman does not have authority over her own body, whether a woman sins if, at the pleasure of her husband—even if disordered—she nevertheless renders the debt to him when he requests it […].
• (f. g5v) Third, it must be asked, on account of the same apostolic word, whether obedience in the marital act toward one’s spouse is so strict that every nod or even a simple request for such a debt binds one to obedience as by necessity, under peril of mortal sin.
Sermons that use this tag in their [Summary]
Code
Liturgical day
Authors
Context: Summary
3/6/17
T19/Sab Saturday after Invocavit
Vicent Ferrer
Introduction
Based on the thema, the simile between listening the word of God and a tent: “In sacra scriptura doctrine evangelice devote audite et auscultare tabernacula vocantur”. Soldiers build the tends for three reasons: “Et prima ratio est pre ardore solis et hoc causa refrigerandi. Secunda contra venti impetum pro securitate. Tertia contra pluvium protegendo” (f. r3v). Similarly, the doctrine of the Gospel, when listened carefully, protects from the ardent carnal passions (lust and greed), from the wind of temptations; from the deluge of worldly sin. Based of the discussion is Isaiah 4.6.
Division based on the Gospel pericope
Firts part
Brief explanation of the pericope. It underlines how Elijah was not dead but was in Eden waiting for the time of his preaching against the Antichrist. It recalls that, according to Luke, Jesus discussed with him and Moses about his Passion and how it is determined by God’s overabundant mercy. Two secrets (secreta): why the transfiguration; why there are these three disciples and two saints from the Old Testament. In general, a valid number of witnesses was required. In specific, the three apostles were the closest to Jesus: Peter was already the pope (“erat iam papa constitutus”); James the future first martyr; John was elected to take care of the Virgin and the beloved disciple. Why Moses between the patriarchs, and why Elijah and not Enoch? “Questio est insoluta […] doctrinas varias”. Among the various opinions, Ferrer takes the one in which they were those who did 40 days of fasting, so the Christians (we) need to fast during Lent so to experience the transfiguration on Easter by means of holy communion (eucharist): “In quo clare patet quantum placet deo sacrum hoc ieiunium quadragesime. Ideo debemus ieiunare quadragesimam, et in die Pasche erimus in transfiguratione, scilicet communicando et poterimus dicere cum apostolo Paulo: Nos autem omnes revelata facie gloriam dei, speculantes in eadem imaginem transformamur a claritate in claritatem tanquam a domini spiritu (2 Cor 3). Nota hic quomodo Christus Moyses et Helyas ieiunaverunt quadragesimam”. Jesus did a Lent in prayer; Moses in listening (applied to mass and preaching): and Elijah walking (applied to go to church and to acquire indulgence). They set a clear example: “Sic nos ad instar Christi debemus vacare orantionibus […] Secundo ad instar Moysi audire missas, sermones […] Tercio ad instar Helye ambulare et ieiunare itinerado […] hoc est visitando ecclesias, quia in omnibus sunt multe indulgentie, et post ire ad vesperas et in posterum in pascha eritis digni habere gloriam paradisi” (f. r4rv).
Second part
The placid acceptance (placida acceptio) – implies of the Passion – since he already foretasted heaven. Peter suggested three tents thinking of coupling the people in this way: Moses and John; Elijah and James, Jesus and Peter. A quite developed semi-dramatic section that imagines Moses back to the limbo where he announces what has happen (and so, the upcoming liberation), while Elijah goes back to Eden and speaks with Enoch, who ask also why he was not invited, with the answer that insists again on fasting: “O, cur ego non ivi? O, cur ego non fui?”. Tunc potuisset respondere: Quia non ieiunasti”.
Spiritual interpretation of why Jesus did not answer to Peter's request. If the Glossa says that it was an irrational question, Ferrer suggests a deeper meaning, namely that Peter was asking to enter into glory and what happens next indicates the five necessary stages of this journey: cloud = penance; voice of God = obedience; fall to the ground = fear; the approaching of Christ = the day of the final judgment (for this reason Christ tells them: "Surgite"); seeing Christ alone = only God is in full glory.
Third part (extremely brief)
Christ did not want the transfiguration to be revealed to the other apostles and disciples to avoid them to be even more scandalized by the sufferings of his Passion. However, Ferrer suggests that (“credo tamen...”) John was allowed to tell the Virgin about it [which source? Check the Meditationes Vitae Christi]
... stages of this journey: cloud = penance ; voice of God =
obedience
; fall to the ground = fear ; the approaching of Christ...
3/6/8
T19/2 Monday after Invocavit
Vicent Ferrer
Necessity to be sheep and not goats.
Five characteristcs, connected with five virtues:
“Simplicem innocentiam
Amplam misericordiam
Firmam patientiam
Veram obedientiam
Dignam penitentiam” (f. p6v)
Sermon in these five points: simple innocence, wide mercy, firm patience, true obedience, appropriate penance
First part
Four isses are discussed, namely:
1) The origin of idolatry;
2) The multiplication of the names of the gods;
3) The role of exterior acts (opera exteriora) in the worship of God;
4) Whether it is possible to venerate a rightful dead before his/her canonization.
Second part
Nine possible mistakes of Christians concerning God (and his behaviour). The last one it is against the idea that after the baptism one would be forgiven for any sin and it is followed by a long exemplum taken from the life of Basil about the necessity of contrition.
... forgiven for any sin and it is followed by a long _
exemplum
_ taken from the life of Basil about the necessity...