"In die parasceves devotissimus modus passionis domini nostri Iesu Christi contemplandus in quatuor viis cum utilibus questionibus". Introduction Ample introduction, which immediately underlines the duty of compassion and of weeping on Good Friday, as it will prove that one is a real Christian – a theme recurrent along the sermon which insist on the need for the preacher to move the audience and for the listeners to be moved by the Passion: «ido ipsam [Passionem] tenemur singuli qui sumus fideles adulti diligenter devote et lachrymabiliter sub pena eterne damnationis attendere» (f. H6r). This is proven in four points, namely ¬autoritates, rationes, similitudines, exempla. At the end of the first point, the preachers imagines Christ who addresses directly the human soul and who states that the Good Friday sermon serves to discern who is a true Christian (i.e. a limb of his body), since s/he will weep: «Attende bene quis ego sum et vide que patior et meam passionem fac tuam per compassionem et fletum. Id circo enim in hac die predicare facio meam acerbam passionem ut videam qui sunt membra mea, illi profecto qui sentiunt per compassionem, illi vero sunt alieni qui non dolent ergo nec curant flere» (f. H6v). On the basis of Nicholas of Lyra the body metaphor is then applied to the different groups in the Church. The salvific effect of the Passion needs to be welcomed by compassion and love (« per dilectione et compassione»), since: «ille qui illi non compatitur, dannabitur»; f. H7r). Imediately is presented as best exemplum the Virgin Mary, who was most sorrowful during the Passion (the key events are immediately listed) – she serves as emotional ‘spur’ for the faithful. Brief reference to the common place of the impossibility to pray the Ave Maria on the Good Friday – and so the need to turn towards the cross, using the hymn O crux ave (f. H7v).  Sermon body The sermon is organized around four routes (viae) of the Passion, which mark the chronological order of the Passion: «Et ideo charissimi salvatoris mundi discipuli et illius veri filii per quatour vias attendamus hodie et videamus redemptoris nostri maximum dolorem...» (f. H7v). 1: from Bethania to Jerusalem 2: to the Gethsemane 3: return as prisoner to the city 4: to the place of crucifixion. Each part is introduced by three theological questions (quaestiones) on the Passion (e.g. its necessity, role of God the Father, how pain and joy cohexisted in Christ during the Passion, whether it is the supreme pain ...), followed by a quite plain postillatio of the Passion narrative (harmonizing the four Gospels, with references mainly to Nicholas of Lyra), which includes several emotional addresses to the audience and/or dramatic description of the reaction of the Virgin Mary and the other characters of the Passion. Part one. Noteworthy the passage about what would have happened if Judas and the Jews did not betray Christ, with the hypothesis – presented in a moving way, with direct dialogues – that Jesus would have asked Peter or the Virgin Mary to crucify him [same reasoning in sermon 39] (f. I1r). Ample description of the last ‘private’ meeting of Jesus and the Virgin before his Passion, a very emotional and affective tone (full of kissing and weeping) in this direct dialogue between the two characters (Laskai is careful to state that this is an hypothetical reconstruction). Reference to Bonaventure. (f. I2v-I3r) Here and elsewhere addresses to the faithful soul to contemplate and see the Passion: «O anima mea, anima mea, vide quomodo filius benedicit matrem, et quomodo mater ad mortem licentiat filium. Vide inquam quam copiose flent discipuli, quam pie lachrymantur sancte muliere...» (f. I3r). This kind of address is also used to summarize each section. Part two. The sermon imagines the dialogue between Christ and the angel in the garden (f. I5v), and first description of the sufferings of Christ after his capture, with an emphatic address to the human soul, who is invited to address the Virgin Mary and to go in spirit to the places of the Passion so to gather the hairs of Jesus: «O lachrymandum negotium. O opus cruentis stupendum [...]. O anima christiana, quid audis? Quid cogitas? [...]. Vade igitur anima devota ad locum captivationis Christi saltem in spiritu, et te prosterne ibidem illi gratias agendo et evulsos crines et barbam sanctam recolligendo devotissime» (f. I6v). Part three opens with the descriuption of the diciples divided in groups who cry for Jesus' capture. Very emotional description of the announcement of Jesus capture by John the apostle to the Virgin Mary, with a detailed scene of collective weeping that involve Mary Magdalene, Martha and Lazarus of Bethania. The texts – in the direct discourse - simulates the speaking and weeping together with the anaphoric and pathetic use of heu. It finishes with the invitation to the audience to associate to this group of disciples, who moves towards Jerusalem in search of Jesus: «Ideo associa te mentaliter ad comitivam illius et cum ea attende et vide si est dolor...» (f. I8v), with the repetition of the thema that dots the sermon. Hence, the prosecution of the narrative of the Passion, although presented in a quite plain way, is supposed to happen in front of a special group of viewers/witnesses among which the listeners have been invited to stay.The emphatic tone returns at the end of the section, with the flagellation, with a renewed invitation to compassion and mental participation to the Passion (f. K2r). In comparison, references to the Jews’ responsibility is quite brief and plain. Part four. Christ on the cross as book that teaches all the virtues and distinction between Old testament figurae and he as veritas et identitas (f. K2v). Empathic description of the crucifixion, underling the point of view of the Virgin Mary and the appeal to the faithful to compassion. There is an insistence on the visual language (f. K3v). Yet, it seems that the sermon has to proceed quickly in this section, since – for instance – there is no elaboration on Jesus last words, yet just a brief expansion of with a discourse of Mary to his son on the cross. The sermon closes with a brief but vivid and graphic description of the mourning of the Virgin Mary and the disciples on the death body of Christ, the repetition of the thema and a final exhortation to compassion, with the exhortation to a final collective cry («cum grandi clamore et fletu magno dicamus sic: Christe fili dei vivi, miserere nobis [...]. Tandem unanimiter alta voce dicamus: Iesus, Iesus, Iesus!» (f. K4v).

Introduction Any novelty is hard to believe, hence the need of several apparitions of Jesus after his resurrection so that the disciples might be able to believe it - quaestio: why did not Jesus remain continuously with them in that period? His absence serves the process of internalization and reflection. His continuous presence would be emotionally overwhelming (as for a lover the presence of the beloved). Divisio First part The disciples returned to fish since being a fisher was not a sinful activity (difference with the case of Matthew, who had been a moneylander). On the moral level (moraliter) the reflection on the laws about fishing (who can fish where) leads to the consideration of the situation of the sinner who – as a fish that escaped from a private and safe pool (i.e. the church) – is exposed to anyone who tries to fish them. There are three types of fishers: God, the preacher, the devil. “Hominem ideo sic in libertate vagantem extra ecclesia tres piscatores capere nituntur scilicet: Deus qui est proprius et supremus Homo predicator et medius Dyabolus raptor et pessimus” (48A) 1.1. God the father is a fisher in the creation, and the Son and the Holy Spirit joined him in this activity (as the disciples in the pericope joined Peter). The rebellion of Lucifer and the sin of the man are a rupture in the original net, so it was necessary to try to another strategy by sending the son to fish with the hook (his divinity) and the bait (his humanity): “voluit mittere filium suum in capturam alteram ut hamo deietatis piscature que humanitate als mit einem kerder [vernacular expression; macaronic] tegit deitatem...» (48B). In this way, on the one hand the devil (the great whale) was deceived by the bait, captured and closed in hell; at the same time – with the same hidden hook – caught many people who took from hell to heaven (harrowing of hell). Not, the eucharist is an is even more sophisticate hook, since not only the divinity is hidden (as it was in the incarnation) but also the humanity. However, when it is taken in a condition of sin, one condemns him/herself, as said by the apostle. 1.2. Common place of the preacher as fisher; however, at the beginning the fish was easier, since now the church got old («antiquata») and the hearts of the people are hardened by vices and sins. Three things obstacle the fishing: a) the wind pushes the fishes to stay to the sea bottom – so the negative inspirations by devils and evil people; b) transparent water allows the fishes to see the hook – so the bad companies that divert people from listening the word of God; c) an inappropriate net, which might be with too large or too narrow holes – so many listeners, when they hear a too strict preaching abandon the church, and this might dishearten the preacher. 1.3. The devil has many strategies to fish the souls, i.e. through many types of sins. Brief outline of the devil’s hand, with its five fingers targeted to different type of people: «Het enim manus dyaboli quinque digitos habet: symoniam in clericis, rapinam in nobilibus, usuram in burgensibus, furtum in latronibus, et circumventionem in mercatoribus» (48E). Second part The apparition of Jesus on the shore as symbol of the need to stick to him who will help to escape from the shipwrek in the dangerous water of this world and from the pirates, i.e. the devil: «Adhereamus ergo illo firmo fundamento ut liberari possumus a naufragio et crudeli pirato dyabolo, quia Iesus stat ante nos in littore ad designandum quod immobiliter vult nobis adesse (?), si cordialiter eum diligamus. Stabiliter in eum confidamus. Firmiter in eum credamus» (48G) [Note the use of the first-person plural]. 2.1. Since we are unstable, we need to stay attached to Christ by means of love («debemus ergo nos qui sumus instabiles vinculo amoris ad Christum ligare et stringere»), instead the devil is a lord, who destroys those who are linked to him, as explained in the fable  (fabula) of the lion, the wolf and the fox that hunt together: "lupus et vulpes se leoni associaverut in venatione" [it is not the fable by Aesop]. The fable has it moral interpatation (moraliter). 2.2. Full trust in Christ, who is like the ancor in the tempest. We must trust him completely for three reasons: «propter caritatem adoptionus, veritatem promissions et pietatem reddicionis» (48I). Interesting to note that here Christ is the father: «Nam Christus nos adoptavit et patrem nostrum se constituit». References to commentaries to the Pater noster and to the exemplum of the prodigal son [there was an established between Christ’s resurrection and this parable]. 2.3. Need to believe firmly, since only a faith well-rooted bears fruits. This means also a faith informed by love (fides formata by caritas), since also the devils and those in mortal sin have a faith without fruits (fides informis). This leads to a detailed passage on necromancy: necromancers and charmers (divinatores; carminatrices) are defined as heretics, since they associate with the demons. About the vetula (witches) and their believe in shapeshifting and nocturnal flight, the sermon quotes the canon episcopi, yet also recalling that they must be burn at stake and their goods sold out. The quaestio on the effectiveness of their practices (both in healing and harming) is due to the illusion of the devil. An exemplum about a old woman (vetula) who deceived a woman who asked her for help to change the attitude of her violent husband serves to prove that are scams and deceits. The vetula teaches the woman a spell during the night, while offering lard to the devil – the charms are in vernacular (German, macaronic). Third part Peter taking out his clothes and jumping into the water symbolizes that hope of the reward makes bear strains and pains in this world, as it is said with a direct exhortation: «Debemus expoliare cum Petro veterem hominem cum actibus suis et mittere in amaritudinem laboris virtutum et deo fideliter servire. Iuxta illud Deuteronomi 6: Dominus deum tuum adorabis et illi soli servies (Deuteronomy 6.13)” (48L). This biblical sentence serves as a sort of thema of this section, since it serves to explain «que domino nostro libenter servire debemus»: «Conditionis liberalioris dominus est. Dilectionis uberioris tuus est. Prelationis maioris solus deu est» (48M). 3.1. Only Jesus is the lord who can save the people (solus Iesus), others are only nominally lords, as showed by the exemplum of the philosopher who replied to the messengers of the king Philippus. 3.2. One has to serve Christ. How? As reply the sermon introduces the story of the pauper Guido sering the emperor and the long allegorical explanation (moraliter) of the services that Guido performed [the story comes from the Gesta romanorum, nr. 17 ed. Oesterley]. It depicts a demanding form of Christian life, since its starting point is when one is already pauper through prayer, fasting, almsgiving [note: this is particularly apt at the end of Lent], it includes frequent exam of conscience so to do twice a week a confession or contrition, it asks also the effort to set the example for other (somehow, a pastoral perspective). Finally, the perseverant memory of the Passion protects from any devilish attacks [also this is tuned to the liturgical period]. 3.3. The service to God needs to be put before anything else, since our good is all in that. Final prayer, with a direct appeal to God: «Esse enim sine te est sine deo esse, in maris periculo sine gubernatore, in carcere sine consolatore, in exilio sine amico, inter hostes sine adiutorio, in bello sine duce, in tenebris sine luce. Unde sine deo vivere est vivendo mori et decedere. Fac ergo, o domine Iesu, me semper vivere in te e sine te noli me derelinquere, ut cum dies advenerit mei clamoris, mea merces sis huius laboris ac virgo beatissima assit semper precata, ut Francisco cum (!) seraphico sempiterno fruar premio. Amen» [significant the reference to saint Francis at the end of the sermon collection]

Introduction Based on the thema, the simile between listening the word of God and a tent: “In sacra scriptura doctrine evangelice devote audite et auscultare tabernacula vocantur”. Soldiers build the tends for three reasons: “Et prima ratio est pre ardore solis et hoc causa refrigerandi. Secunda contra venti impetum pro securitate. Tertia contra pluvium protegendo” (f. r3v). Similarly, the doctrine of the Gospel, when listened carefully, protects from the ardent carnal passions (lust and greed), from the wind of temptations; from the deluge of worldly sin. Based of the discussion is Isaiah 4.6. Division based on the Gospel pericope Firts part Brief explanation of the pericope. It underlines how Elijah was not dead but was in Eden waiting for the time of his preaching against the Antichrist. It recalls that, according to Luke, Jesus discussed with him and Moses about his Passion and how it is determined by God’s overabundant mercy. Two secrets (secreta): why the transfiguration; why there are these three disciples and two saints from the Old Testament. In general, a valid number of witnesses was required. In specific, the three apostles were the closest to Jesus: Peter was already the pope (“erat iam papa constitutus”); James the future first martyr; John was elected to take care of the Virgin and the beloved disciple. Why Moses between the patriarchs, and why Elijah and not Enoch? “Questio est insoluta […] doctrinas varias”. Among the various opinions, Ferrer takes the one in which they were those who did 40 days of fasting, so the Christians (we) need to fast during Lent so to experience the transfiguration on Easter by means of holy communion (eucharist): “In quo clare patet quantum placet deo sacrum hoc ieiunium quadragesime. Ideo debemus ieiunare quadragesimam, et in die Pasche erimus in transfiguratione, scilicet communicando et poterimus dicere cum apostolo Paulo: Nos autem omnes revelata facie gloriam dei, speculantes in eadem imaginem transformamur a claritate in claritatem tanquam a domini spiritu (2 Cor 3). Nota hic quomodo Christus Moyses et Helyas ieiunaverunt quadragesimam”. Jesus did a Lent in prayer; Moses in listening (applied to mass and preaching): and Elijah walking (applied to go to church and to acquire indulgence). They set a clear example: “Sic nos ad instar Christi debemus vacare orantionibus […] Secundo ad instar Moysi audire missas, sermones […] Tercio ad instar Helye ambulare et ieiunare itinerado […] hoc est visitando ecclesias, quia in omnibus sunt multe indulgentie, et post ire ad vesperas et in posterum in pascha eritis digni habere gloriam paradisi” (f. r4rv). Second part The placid acceptance (placida acceptio) – implies of the Passion – since he already foretasted heaven. Peter suggested three tents thinking of coupling the people in this way: Moses and John; Elijah and James, Jesus and Peter. A quite developed semi-dramatic section that imagines Moses back to the limbo where he announces what has happen (and so, the upcoming liberation), while Elijah goes back to Eden and speaks with Enoch, who ask also why he was not invited, with the answer that insists again on fasting: “O, cur ego non ivi? O, cur ego non fui?”. Tunc potuisset respondere: Quia non ieiunasti”. Spiritual interpretation of why Jesus did not answer to Peter's request. If the Glossa says that it was an irrational question, Ferrer suggests a deeper meaning, namely that Peter was asking to enter into glory and what happens next indicates the five necessary stages of this journey: cloud = penance; voice of God = obedience; fall to the ground = fear; the approaching of Christ = the day of the final judgment (for this reason Christ tells them: "Surgite"); seeing Christ alone = only God is in full glory. Third part (extremely brief) Christ did not want the transfiguration to be revealed to the other apostles and disciples to avoid them to be even more scandalized by the sufferings of his Passion. However, Ferrer suggests that (“credo tamen...”) John was allowed to tell the Virgin about it [which source? Check the Meditationes Vitae Christi]

Ferrer begins by saying that he will follow the emperors’ style (“In isto sermone cogitavi tenere modum imperatorum etc”) – not clear what he means with it exactly. Yet, there is no main division. The sermon first comments on and dramatizes the Gospel pericope and then it discusses seven point derived from it. The postils and dramatization of the story of the transfiguration expand on elements present also in the previous sermon (see 3/6/17). It explain better the couples for the three tents: John with Moses as contemplatives and visioners; James with Elijah as champions of penance; Peter with Jesus since he chooses the better part (cf. Luke 10.42). The semi-dramatic section is livelier than in the previous sermon when it depicts the return of Moses in the limbo and of Elijah to Eden. The reason of their choice – i.e. the fasting during Lent - is developed in the fourth point of the sermon. Seven questions are presented without annuncing them and actually, they follow the narrative of the Gospel pericope (some points occur also in the previous sermon): 1. Transfiguration and shining of Jesus 2. The mountain symbolizes penance and it is associated with Lent, since it separates people from the world: “Unde et tempus quadragesimale est mons altus et desertus”. The good christians go up it, leaving behind the wordly pleasures. Penitence has the power to transform/transfigure Christ from the image of the inflexible justice to that of generous mercy: “In monte quadragesimali Christus transfiguratur de figura iusticie rigorose in figura misericordie copiose propter nostram penitentiam” (f. r5v). 3. Symbol of the three disciples: Peter symbolizes bishops and prelates who must know the Bible; John the virgins; James the martyrs. Otherwise: John the innocent people; Peter the obedient and James the penitents. 4. The choice of Elijah and Moses indicates all those – alive and death – who performed Lent correctly, with a parenetic address to the audience about their fasting: “Quis vestrum poterit dicere quod de toto tempore vite sue ieiunavit nam quadragesimam integram et perfecte? Credo quod pauci sunt”. The sermon recalls some common excuses of the people. Next it points out that the difference between the strain of Lent and the suffering in Hell (i,e. the destiny of those who dismiss penitence) is the same between wearing a delicate shirt and a burning armour. In hell fasting is perennial as it is attested by the rich man of Luke 16 (“modo MCCCC anni sunt et ultra…”; commonplace in sermons). Brief mention of the different way to fast of Jesus, Moises and Elijah (see previous sermon). 5. The two witnesses talked with Jesus about the extreme suffering of his Passion. This is presented in a  semi-dramatic form (“Iam videamus practicam…”), with Elijah and Moses who mention different moments of the Passion constantly arguing that it would be enough much less for the salvation/redemption of humanity. Other parenetic address to the audience: the listeners are called to resist against sin, presenting the paradox of thoseready to face a bear or to go to war and yet afraid of fasting during Lent. 6. Three tents symbolize the celestial hierarchies and are symbol of the future home of the saved people: penitentes (penitent with Elijah; the religious and political rulers (presidentes) with Moses; those who are excellentes who live an apostolic life will stay with Jesus. 7. The three apostles must not reveal what happened, to help the other disciles (see previous sermon) and to avoid vainglory.

Introduction The feverish woman (i.e. Simon’s mother-in-law, cf. Luke 4, 38-39) = the soul of Adam sick with the fever of sin.
Divisio (see above) 1) First part: four reasons: 1. «Praise»: one is worthy of praise if, despite being able to do evil, he doesn’t do it; 2. «Honor»: it's more honorable to succeed through one's own virtue rather than that of others; consequently, it’s more honorable to obtain heaven by one's own merits rather than by divine grace. 3. «Conservation grace»: sin allows human beings to become humble (exemplum taken from Paul 2 Cor 12, 7); 4. «Improvement»: error strengthens human beings and makes them better (exempla: St. Peter and Mary Magdalene). 2) Second part: four reasons: 1. «Perfection»: the free will of human beings is consistent with the perfection of the world; 2. «Mediation»: since angels only do good and Satan and his followers only do evil, an intermediate creature free to do good and evil was needed; 3. «Decoration»: the freedom of human beings is a beautiful thing (reference to “Ricardo [secundo Sententiarum]: perhaps Richard of Knapwell?); 4. «Exaltation»: the human being is exalted more for having sinned and then repented. 3) Third part: four reasons: 1. About the divine power: with the existence of sin God wanted to demonstrate that he has the power not only to create, but also to save human beings. 2. About the divine wisdom: divine wisdom manifests itself in the ability to derive good from evil; the usefulness of sin is in the good that comes from it (exempla: the creation of human being resulting from the sin of Lucifer; incarnation of Christ resulting from Adam's sin [“O certe necessarium Ade peccatum, quod Christi morte deletum est! O felix culpa que talem ac tantum meruit habere Redemptorem!”, quote from the Exsultet]); 3. About the divine goodness: without sin we couldn’t know God's goodness towards human beings; 4. About the divine justice: without sin God couldn’t show his justice.

Introduction
-
Divisio (see above) 1) First part: the first misery into which human beings fall due to sin is the “servitude”: Qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati (quote from John 8, 34). Exemplum: the liberation of Peter (from Acts 12, 1-11; according to Caracciolo, «Peter in prison represents the sinner, the prison is the sensual desire, the two chains represent two natural defects, i.e. the difficulty in doing good and the ignorance [reference to Augustine], the guards represent worldly pleasures and promises»). 2) Second part: the second misery into which human beings fall due to sin is the “disfigurement” (or “stain”). Exemplum: sins of Salomon (from Book of Sirach 47, 22). Sin makes human beings similar to beasts, and «it’s worse to be compared to beasts than to be born a beast» (reference to John Chrysostom’s «homily of the Ascension»). 3) Third part: the third misery into which human beings fall due to sin is the “loss of temporal goods”: 1. Sin brings kingdoms and kings to ruin (exempla: Saul loses the kingdom of Israel [Samuel to Saul:«Because you have despised the precept of God, the Lord has despised you, and doesn’t want you to be king of Israel», quote from 1Samuel 15, 26]; David loses the obedience of the people of Israel [from 2Samuel 24]); 2. because of sin human beings sometimes lose their possessions (quotes from Luke 12, 20 and Psalmi 48, 11-12); 3. because of sin human beings sometimes lose their reputation («A good name is better than great riches», quote from Proverbs 24; exemplum: Mary Magdalene).
Conclusion Short exposition of the three types of sin: 1) “Original” sin: those who die with original sin cannot obtain eternal life (Nisi quis renatus fuerit ex aqua et spiritu santo non potest intrare in regnum Dei, quote from John 3, 5); 2) “Venial” sin: it doesn’t deprive the human beings of the love of God but can lead them to commit mortal sin; 3) “Mortal” sin: anyone who commits mortal sin and doesn’t confess is «in a state of perdition, damned in the hands of the devil, totally deprived of the goods of the faithful, deprived of the grace and hope of eternal life, worthy of death, enemy of God, expelled from heaven, intruder in the world without advantage».

Introduction Interpretation of the thema: God deprived the ungrateful Jews of the vinea, i.e. of the honor of divine law, and gave it to aliae agricolae, i.e. to the Christians, because they were more grateful.
Divisio (see above) 1) First part: only the Christians are (spiritually) regenerated by the water of baptism; all other peoples are not children of God, but of «carnal and earthly Adam», so they live «carnally and bestially, like Jews, Turks and Moors». 2) Second part: only the Christians are freed from the «chains of sin»; “Tibi dabo claves regni celorum; et quodcumque ligaveris super terram, erit ligatum et in celis» (God to Peter, quote from Matthew 16, 19). 3) Third part: only the Christians were delivered from the hands of the devil by Jesus Christ; the submission of other peoples to the devil is represented by the image of Samson turning the Philistines' millstone (reference to Judges 16, 21). 4) Fourth part: the Jewish people, although they received the Law from God, never had such true news of God as that contained in the “New Law of Christ” intended for Christians (Moses, Abraham and Jacob never saw God clearly, but always through forms temporarily assumed by God; Christians, on the other hand, received the New Law directly from God made man). 5) Fifth part: Christians are the only people to whom God has given his body and blood as nourishment. Caracciolo mocks the Jews («O Giudei, chi eravati già chiamati figliuoli de Dio, a la barba vostra! [i.e. “Take that, Jews!”], because the manna they received in the desert didn’t give them eternal and blessed life as the body and blood of Christ give Christians (“Patres vestri manducaverunt manna in deserto et mortui sunt […] qui manducat hunc panem [i.e. the body of Christ] vivet in eternum” [quote from John 6, 49 and 59]), provided they receive it in a worthy manner (“Chi lo manza indigniamente, se manza el iudicio in contra”, quote from 1Corinthians 11, 29). 6) Sixth part: only Christians have received many effective remedies from God to heal their sins (other peoples, on the contrary, “go to the hot house” [i.e. to Hell] whether they die with mortal or venial sin). For Christians, the remedy for original sin is provided by baptism (reference to Decretum Gratiani); the remedies for mortal sins are the general confession during mass, the holy water and the devout prayer of the Pater Noster. 7) Seventh part: only Christians, as true children of God, can inherit God's grace and all his glory (“Si autem filii et heredes: heredes quidem Dei, coheredes autem Christi” [quote from Romans 8, 17]); all the other peoples are like bastard children and will not be welcomed into Paradise. Christians, precisely because of this greater reward received from God, must love, fear and reverence God more than all other peoples (“The more each person must be humble and ready to serve God for the gifts received, the more he or she feels obliged to give credit for the good received"[reference to Gregory the Great]).

Introduction  Just as there are different medicines depending on the type of disease, so there are different modi correctionum depending on the type of sin. Three types of sin (corresponding to three different correctiones): 1. Ex ignorantia: the medicine for this sin is knowledge (scientia); exemplum: Paul, who sinned because of his ignorance and was cured by Christ with the medicina scientie. 2. Ex fragilitate: the medicine for this sin is the amor dei; exemplum: Peter who denied Christ three times. 3. Ex malicia propria et iniquitate cordis: the medicine for this sin is the timor damnationis et iudicii; exemplum: Judas Iscariot.
Divisio
1) First part: concerning the “inner formation”, called by the Doctors nativitas in utero. To explain this type of nativitas, the preacher uses the example of the nucleus planted and germinated in the ground, which "iam est natus, licet extra terram nihil appareat". The thema can be interpreted on the basis of this type of nativitas: for Judas, in fact, it would have been better not to be born, since without the birth of the body there can be no infusion of the soul and, consequently, no damnation. Quaestio: is it better to be something or nothing, i.e. not to be? Compared to being with the burden of eternal damnation, it’s better not to be at all (just as it's better to own nothing than to own something that entails great economic burdens and obligations); the damned, in fact, would rather not be than continue to exist in damnation (“damati desiderant mortem et appetunt non esse, sed non possunt mori”; follows a quotation from Revelation 9, 6). In light of this, the preacher exhorts people to avert the risk of going to hell in good time and not to claim to go to heaven if they commit sin in their actions. 2) Second part: concerning the “outer production”, i.e. when the child leaves the mother's womb. The thema is also true with regard to this second type of birth, since if Judas had not been “outwardly born”, i.e. had he died in his mother's womb, he would have died with only original sin and, consequently, would have had a better condition in the afterlife in the Limbo of the Infants (where souls, although not having access to Paradise, are not afflicted by sensory pain). Ferrer then addresses the issue of original sin, which "non est peccatum factum a creatura sed receptum" and, therefore, doesn’t involve sensory punishment; the inheritance of original sin is explained through the simile of a king (God) who entrusts an impregnable castle (the Earthly Paradise) to a traitorous soldier (Adam and Eve) who surrenders the castle to the king's enemy (the Devil): the merciful king does not kill the traitorous soldier, but forbids his descendants (the mankind) to enter his court (the Paradise); only baptism allows access to Paradise again. The souls in the Limbo of the Infants on the one hand give thanks to God, for he has exempted them from the pains of Hell; on the other hand, when they see the glory of the blessed, they complain and make seven accusations: 1. Against the parents, if through their fault the children died without being baptised (reference to husbands who treat their wives badly, causing abortion); 2. Against foolish mothers who, despite knowing they are pregnant, don’t properly guard the thesaurum eis commissum; 3. Against widows, nuns, girls and wives who terminate illegitimate pregnancies; 4. Against those (medici, apothecarii) who were complicit in their deaths; 5. Against mothers who wait a long time before baptising their children and, in the meantime, smother them with their udders (here the preacher is instructed to display the modus lactandi); 6. Againts the priests and the lay people who baptise in dangerous conditions (here the preacher is instructed to display the formam baptisandi); 7. Against fathers who don’t bother to baptize children conceived with an unfaithful woman (iudea vel agarena). 3) Third part: concerning the “higher adoption”, i.e. when the creature, with baptism, acquires the “right to inherit Paradise” (ius habendi paradisum). According to Ferrer, the thema can also be interpreted in relation to this type of nativitas: bonum erat ei si non esset natus (= baptisatus) homo ille, since a baptised Christian, if condemned to damnation as ungrateful, has a greater penalty than an infidel (as proof of this, the episode of St. Macarius and the skull is reported, taken from the Vitas patrum). It’s possible to trace a concordance in a prophecy by David (cf. Psalms 54); the final section of the sermon, starting with the prophecy sentence “mecum dulces capiebas cibos” (Psalms 54, 15), deals with the sacrament of communion: it’s appropriate to receive this sacrament on Easter Day, provided it’s received in a worthy manner (in this regard, women may adorn their bodies "modeste, cogitando quoniam sicut sacerdotes ornant et preparant altaria").