Introduction Any novelty is hard to believe, hence the need of several apparitions of Jesus after his resurrection so that the disciples might be able to believe it - quaestio: why did not Jesus remain continuously with them in that period? His absence serves the process of internalization and reflection. His continuous presence would be emotionally overwhelming (as for a lover the presence of the beloved). Divisio First part The disciples returned to fish since being a fisher was not a sinful activity (difference with the case of Matthew, who had been a moneylander). On the moral level (moraliter) the reflection on the laws about fishing (who can fish where) leads to the consideration of the situation of the sinner who – as a fish that escaped from a private and safe pool (i.e. the church) – is exposed to anyone who tries to fish them. There are three types of fishers: God, the preacher, the devil. “Hominem ideo sic in libertate vagantem extra ecclesia tres piscatores capere nituntur scilicet: Deus qui est proprius et supremus Homo predicator et medius Dyabolus raptor et pessimus” (48A) 1.1. God the father is a fisher in the creation, and the Son and the Holy Spirit joined him in this activity (as the disciples in the pericope joined Peter). The rebellion of Lucifer and the sin of the man are a rupture in the original net, so it was necessary to try to another strategy by sending the son to fish with the hook (his divinity) and the bait (his humanity): “voluit mittere filium suum in capturam alteram ut hamo deietatis piscature que humanitate als mit einem kerder [vernacular expression; macaronic] tegit deitatem...» (48B). In this way, on the one hand the devil (the great whale) was deceived by the bait, captured and closed in hell; at the same time – with the same hidden hook – caught many people who took from hell to heaven (harrowing of hell). Not, the eucharist is an is even more sophisticate hook, since not only the divinity is hidden (as it was in the incarnation) but also the humanity. However, when it is taken in a condition of sin, one condemns him/herself, as said by the apostle. 1.2. Common place of the preacher as fisher; however, at the beginning the fish was easier, since now the church got old («antiquata») and the hearts of the people are hardened by vices and sins. Three things obstacle the fishing: a) the wind pushes the fishes to stay to the sea bottom – so the negative inspirations by devils and evil people; b) transparent water allows the fishes to see the hook – so the bad companies that divert people from listening the word of God; c) an inappropriate net, which might be with too large or too narrow holes – so many listeners, when they hear a too strict preaching abandon the church, and this might dishearten the preacher. 1.3. The devil has many strategies to fish the souls, i.e. through many types of sins. Brief outline of the devil’s hand, with its five fingers targeted to different type of people: «Het enim manus dyaboli quinque digitos habet: symoniam in clericis, rapinam in nobilibus, usuram in burgensibus, furtum in latronibus, et circumventionem in mercatoribus» (48E). Second part The apparition of Jesus on the shore as symbol of the need to stick to him who will help to escape from the shipwrek in the dangerous water of this world and from the pirates, i.e. the devil: «Adhereamus ergo illo firmo fundamento ut liberari possumus a naufragio et crudeli pirato dyabolo, quia Iesus stat ante nos in littore ad designandum quod immobiliter vult nobis adesse (?), si cordialiter eum diligamus. Stabiliter in eum confidamus. Firmiter in eum credamus» (48G) [Note the use of the first-person plural]. 2.1. Since we are unstable, we need to stay attached to Christ by means of love («debemus ergo nos qui sumus instabiles vinculo amoris ad Christum ligare et stringere»), instead the devil is a lord, who destroys those who are linked to him, as explained in the fable  (fabula) of the lion, the wolf and the fox that hunt together: "lupus et vulpes se leoni associaverut in venatione" [it is not the fable by Aesop]. The fable has it moral interpatation (moraliter). 2.2. Full trust in Christ, who is like the ancor in the tempest. We must trust him completely for three reasons: «propter caritatem adoptionus, veritatem promissions et pietatem reddicionis» (48I). Interesting to note that here Christ is the father: «Nam Christus nos adoptavit et patrem nostrum se constituit». References to commentaries to the Pater noster and to the exemplum of the prodigal son [there was an established between Christ’s resurrection and this parable]. 2.3. Need to believe firmly, since only a faith well-rooted bears fruits. This means also a faith informed by love (fides formata by caritas), since also the devils and those in mortal sin have a faith without fruits (fides informis). This leads to a detailed passage on necromancy: necromancers and charmers (divinatores; carminatrices) are defined as heretics, since they associate with the demons. About the vetula (witches) and their believe in shapeshifting and nocturnal flight, the sermon quotes the canon episcopi, yet also recalling that they must be burn at stake and their goods sold out. The quaestio on the effectiveness of their practices (both in healing and harming) is due to the illusion of the devil. An exemplum about a old woman (vetula) who deceived a woman who asked her for help to change the attitude of her violent husband serves to prove that are scams and deceits. The vetula teaches the woman a spell during the night, while offering lard to the devil – the charms are in vernacular (German, macaronic). Third part Peter taking out his clothes and jumping into the water symbolizes that hope of the reward makes bear strains and pains in this world, as it is said with a direct exhortation: «Debemus expoliare cum Petro veterem hominem cum actibus suis et mittere in amaritudinem laboris virtutum et deo fideliter servire. Iuxta illud Deuteronomi 6: Dominus deum tuum adorabis et illi soli servies (Deuteronomy 6.13)” (48L). This biblical sentence serves as a sort of thema of this section, since it serves to explain «que domino nostro libenter servire debemus»: «Conditionis liberalioris dominus est. Dilectionis uberioris tuus est. Prelationis maioris solus deu est» (48M). 3.1. Only Jesus is the lord who can save the people (solus Iesus), others are only nominally lords, as showed by the exemplum of the philosopher who replied to the messengers of the king Philippus. 3.2. One has to serve Christ. How? As reply the sermon introduces the story of the pauper Guido sering the emperor and the long allegorical explanation (moraliter) of the services that Guido performed [the story comes from the Gesta romanorum, nr. 17 ed. Oesterley]. It depicts a demanding form of Christian life, since its starting point is when one is already pauper through prayer, fasting, almsgiving [note: this is particularly apt at the end of Lent], it includes frequent exam of conscience so to do twice a week a confession or contrition, it asks also the effort to set the example for other (somehow, a pastoral perspective). Finally, the perseverant memory of the Passion protects from any devilish attacks [also this is tuned to the liturgical period]. 3.3. The service to God needs to be put before anything else, since our good is all in that. Final prayer, with a direct appeal to God: «Esse enim sine te est sine deo esse, in maris periculo sine gubernatore, in carcere sine consolatore, in exilio sine amico, inter hostes sine adiutorio, in bello sine duce, in tenebris sine luce. Unde sine deo vivere est vivendo mori et decedere. Fac ergo, o domine Iesu, me semper vivere in te e sine te noli me derelinquere, ut cum dies advenerit mei clamoris, mea merces sis huius laboris ac virgo beatissima assit semper precata, ut Francisco cum (!) seraphico sempiterno fruar premio. Amen» [significant the reference to saint Francis at the end of the sermon collection]

Introduction Based on the thema, the simile between listening the word of God and a tent: “In sacra scriptura doctrine evangelice devote audite et auscultare tabernacula vocantur”. Soldiers build the tends for three reasons: “Et prima ratio est pre ardore solis et hoc causa refrigerandi. Secunda contra venti impetum pro securitate. Tertia contra pluvium protegendo” (f. r3v). Similarly, the doctrine of the Gospel, when listened carefully, protects from the ardent carnal passions (lust and greed), from the wind of temptations; from the deluge of worldly sin. Based of the discussion is Isaiah 4.6. Division based on the Gospel pericope Firts part Brief explanation of the pericope. It underlines how Elijah was not dead but was in Eden waiting for the time of his preaching against the Antichrist. It recalls that, according to Luke, Jesus discussed with him and Moses about his Passion and how it is determined by God’s overabundant mercy. Two secrets (secreta): why the transfiguration; why there are these three disciples and two saints from the Old Testament. In general, a valid number of witnesses was required. In specific, the three apostles were the closest to Jesus: Peter was already the pope (“erat iam papa constitutus”); James the future first martyr; John was elected to take care of the Virgin and the beloved disciple. Why Moses between the patriarchs, and why Elijah and not Enoch? “Questio est insoluta […] doctrinas varias”. Among the various opinions, Ferrer takes the one in which they were those who did 40 days of fasting, so the Christians (we) need to fast during Lent so to experience the transfiguration on Easter by means of holy communion (eucharist): “In quo clare patet quantum placet deo sacrum hoc ieiunium quadragesime. Ideo debemus ieiunare quadragesimam, et in die Pasche erimus in transfiguratione, scilicet communicando et poterimus dicere cum apostolo Paulo: Nos autem omnes revelata facie gloriam dei, speculantes in eadem imaginem transformamur a claritate in claritatem tanquam a domini spiritu (2 Cor 3). Nota hic quomodo Christus Moyses et Helyas ieiunaverunt quadragesimam”. Jesus did a Lent in prayer; Moses in listening (applied to mass and preaching): and Elijah walking (applied to go to church and to acquire indulgence). They set a clear example: “Sic nos ad instar Christi debemus vacare orantionibus […] Secundo ad instar Moysi audire missas, sermones […] Tercio ad instar Helye ambulare et ieiunare itinerado […] hoc est visitando ecclesias, quia in omnibus sunt multe indulgentie, et post ire ad vesperas et in posterum in pascha eritis digni habere gloriam paradisi” (f. r4rv). Second part The placid acceptance (placida acceptio) – implies of the Passion – since he already foretasted heaven. Peter suggested three tents thinking of coupling the people in this way: Moses and John; Elijah and James, Jesus and Peter. A quite developed semi-dramatic section that imagines Moses back to the limbo where he announces what has happen (and so, the upcoming liberation), while Elijah goes back to Eden and speaks with Enoch, who ask also why he was not invited, with the answer that insists again on fasting: “O, cur ego non ivi? O, cur ego non fui?”. Tunc potuisset respondere: Quia non ieiunasti”. Spiritual interpretation of why Jesus did not answer to Peter's request. If the Glossa says that it was an irrational question, Ferrer suggests a deeper meaning, namely that Peter was asking to enter into glory and what happens next indicates the five necessary stages of this journey: cloud = penance; voice of God = obedience; fall to the ground = fear; the approaching of Christ = the day of the final judgment (for this reason Christ tells them: "Surgite"); seeing Christ alone = only God is in full glory. Third part (extremely brief) Christ did not want the transfiguration to be revealed to the other apostles and disciples to avoid them to be even more scandalized by the sufferings of his Passion. However, Ferrer suggests that (“credo tamen...”) John was allowed to tell the Virgin about it [which source? Check the Meditationes Vitae Christi]

Ferrer begins by saying that he will follow the emperors’ style (“In isto sermone cogitavi tenere modum imperatorum etc”) – not clear what he means with it exactly. Yet, there is no main division. The sermon first comments on and dramatizes the Gospel pericope and then it discusses seven point derived from it. The postils and dramatization of the story of the transfiguration expand on elements present also in the previous sermon (see 3/6/17). It explain better the couples for the three tents: John with Moses as contemplatives and visioners; James with Elijah as champions of penance; Peter with Jesus since he chooses the better part (cf. Luke 10.42). The semi-dramatic section is livelier than in the previous sermon when it depicts the return of Moses in the limbo and of Elijah to Eden. The reason of their choice – i.e. the fasting during Lent - is developed in the fourth point of the sermon. Seven questions are presented without annuncing them and actually, they follow the narrative of the Gospel pericope (some points occur also in the previous sermon): 1. Transfiguration and shining of Jesus 2. The mountain symbolizes penance and it is associated with Lent, since it separates people from the world: “Unde et tempus quadragesimale est mons altus et desertus”. The good christians go up it, leaving behind the wordly pleasures. Penitence has the power to transform/transfigure Christ from the image of the inflexible justice to that of generous mercy: “In monte quadragesimali Christus transfiguratur de figura iusticie rigorose in figura misericordie copiose propter nostram penitentiam” (f. r5v). 3. Symbol of the three disciples: Peter symbolizes bishops and prelates who must know the Bible; John the virgins; James the martyrs. Otherwise: John the innocent people; Peter the obedient and James the penitents. 4. The choice of Elijah and Moses indicates all those – alive and death – who performed Lent correctly, with a parenetic address to the audience about their fasting: “Quis vestrum poterit dicere quod de toto tempore vite sue ieiunavit nam quadragesimam integram et perfecte? Credo quod pauci sunt”. The sermon recalls some common excuses of the people. Next it points out that the difference between the strain of Lent and the suffering in Hell (i,e. the destiny of those who dismiss penitence) is the same between wearing a delicate shirt and a burning armour. In hell fasting is perennial as it is attested by the rich man of Luke 16 (“modo MCCCC anni sunt et ultra…”; commonplace in sermons). Brief mention of the different way to fast of Jesus, Moises and Elijah (see previous sermon). 5. The two witnesses talked with Jesus about the extreme suffering of his Passion. This is presented in a  semi-dramatic form (“Iam videamus practicam…”), with Elijah and Moses who mention different moments of the Passion constantly arguing that it would be enough much less for the salvation/redemption of humanity. Other parenetic address to the audience: the listeners are called to resist against sin, presenting the paradox of thoseready to face a bear or to go to war and yet afraid of fasting during Lent. 6. Three tents symbolize the celestial hierarchies and are symbol of the future home of the saved people: penitentes (penitent with Elijah; the religious and political rulers (presidentes) with Moses; those who are excellentes who live an apostolic life will stay with Jesus. 7. The three apostles must not reveal what happened, to help the other disciles (see previous sermon) and to avoid vainglory.

Introduction Natural gold ≠ artificial gold (IA). To eat the gold dust provides strength and protect from leprosy (references to Avicenna and Platearius). The artificial gold is exteriorly similar but without these quality (it’s only an expense and a waste of time and work). The same is true with good works. When they are done with the correct intention, i.e. to glorify God, they protect you from the leprosy of sin. Yet, if they are done "cum sinistra intentione", i.e. for your own glory, they have only an exterior appearance, but without any merit. Biblical reference (Cain and Abel) and to canon law. Questio: "Utrum existens in peccato mortali vel faciens aliquod opus de genere bonorum sinistra intentione frustretur omni premio et nihil mereatur sua operatione" (IB). In the reply, the key authority is Bonaventure: a sinner should not stop from doing good works, since they prepare to receive the grace and dispose to conversion. Distinction between alive works and death works: “Oportet enim quod prius quis desinat esse vitiosus quam incipiat esse virtuosus, et naturaliter remissio peccatorum precedit infusionem gratie” (ID). This leads to discuss about Lent. Since God wants to grant abundant graces for the feast of the Resurrection, hence the Church organized this penitential time so to help the faithful to be ready to welcome them: “ut huius igitur simus capaces ordinavit mater ecclesia vigiliam scilicet tempus penitentie et dispositionis per XL dies quod hodie incipit et omni die aliquod preparativum ponit atque ipsius gratie speciale dispositivum”. Divisio (see above) - based on the whole pericope not on the thema First part Fasting and abstinence should not be hypocritical (in discussing the pericope, note the distinction between litterliter and moraliter). Three main fruits of fasting: Comprimit canis vitia Elevat mentem ad superna Dinat virtutem contra demonia 1.1. Fasting serves to rule the flesh (which is the horse of the soul...). Yet crucial is fasting from sin (IF). Question on who must fast, and list of the categories which are exempted (IG). 1.2. Fasting elevates the mind (series of exempla and ¬auctoritates). Question: if drinking clouds the mind more than eating, why does Lent require fasting from food? (II) 1.3. Fasting wins over devils. Natural example: the elephant wins over the dragon when it has an empty stomach. Question about the type of forbitten food - dairy and eggs are connected with the production of semen and so an arousal to lust (basic notions of medicine): “ex eorum commestione plus superfluit ut vertatur in materiam seminis cuius multiplicatio est maximum incitamentum luxurie” (IK). Second part Appeal to the moderation and the detachment from worldly things. Moraliter: Contraposition among the ancient philosophers about the true richness and happiness of human beings. Epicurean stated the earthly goods (the sermon harshly attacks them) while the Peripatetics said it was virtue, sit it cannot be lost (“qua non servantur in bursa sed in anima”; IL). Positive examples are Socrates renounced to gold (reference taken from the Decretum) and Boethius. Christ is put in the same line of the Peripatetics (“Hanc etiam opinionem doctor noster Christus tenuit...”; IM). One has not to treasure things on hearth for three reasons:  Periculose et damnabilies Nocive et instabiles Infructuose et steriles  2.1. When one looks for richness, s/he is exposed to dangers such as lie, fraud, usury, robbery. Here the sermon quotes the whole parable of the rich fool (Luke 12:16-21) and the sentence on the simplicity of the birds (“Nolite soliciti esse...”; Matthew 6.36). Distinction between different ways of “solicitudo circa temporalia”: necessary, unnecessary, immoral (“talis fuerat in Iudeis et Pylato, timentes ne perderent regnum quod possidebant occiderunt Christum” IN), erroneus. The Gospel criticizes the last three, not the necessary sollicity (such as in sowing or harvesting etc). 2.2. Their possession is harmful, since provokes anxiety and insecurity. Reference to the episode of the encounter of Augustine with the poor person in the Confessiones (IO). 2.3. They are infructuous and make also virtuous people infructuous (internal reference to XIXQ). Third part Necessity of a virtuous behaviour for the eternal reward. Crucial is to have an holy and immaculate life (“vita sancta et immaculata”). Erarium disponere Divicias reponere Custodiam apponere 3.1. Direct parenetic address to the listener in the last section: “Nunc ergo peccator audi me, et deus exaudiet te. Vita tua mors est et vana vita. Vis ergo apprehendere veram vitam, noli alta sapere [...] Per illa enim que tibi dat suadet exire a peccato [...]. Cur ergo bonam mortem desideras et vitam bonam non curas? [...] Iam persuasus es a deo ut recedas a malo”. Dangerous to postpone a good decision: “O frater, noli claudere hostium venie... [...] Iam deus pulsat ad hostium” 3.2. A laborious life of virtue keeps and increases the treasure, since it creates the habitus of virtue. 3.3. The custody of the senses is the protection one needs, since they are the gates of the heart.

Introduction Opposition between Carnival and Lent  "Noster sermo erit de ascensu ad paradisum. Materia erit utilis et bona [...] Cogitanti mihi tempus anni secundum quod vivunt persone mundane magnam invenio differentiam inter tempus carnale, quod finitur hodie, et quadragesime, quod incipit cras, quia differunt sicut ascensus et descensus, volandi in altum et cadendi deorsum. [...] Ecce quomodo tempus carnale est tempus descendendi, sed hoc tempus quadragesime est tempus ascendendi, quia in hoc tempore bonus christianus dimittit vanitates, humiliatur etc restituit, confitetur, facit penitentiam, ieiunat etc. Et incipit hoc tempus cras. Ideo de isto sancto tempore proposui thema: Ecce ascendimus Hirosolimam, id est vitam eternam"; (f. o3v). Allegorical interpretation of music instruments (timpani and chitara) as symbols of lust and avarice.    Main part The body of the sermon builds on the image of Jacob's stairway to heaven (Genesis 28). Its third part elaborates at lenght on the topic “scala est caritas”, where its fifteenth steps are derived from the epistle of that Sunday, namely 1 Corinthians 13, since they were presented by the aposle Paul “qui celum ascenderat” (f. o4v).    Conclusion Exhortation to climb this stairway up, until the death , so to enter in heaven.  Call to those who still have to join the salvific path: “Si vero sit aliquis vestrorum qui non sit in scala bone vite, intret modo, quia nunc incipit tempus scilicet quadragesime: Ecce nunc tempus acceptabile, ecce nunc dies salutis etc."

No introduction. The sermon is immediately divided in four parts derived from the Gospel pericope (see divisio above). - Most part of the sermon deals with the theme of the spiritual battle (see bibliography). In the last section (f. p6r) there is a description of the angels who serve Jesus, once he won over the devil’s temptations in the desert; they provide him with food since he is now hungry. The sermon follows what is found in the Meditationes vitae Christi (and perhaps other source) by saying: “Dicunt hic aliqui devoti contemplativi…”. It describes the angels who go to the Virgin Mary, taking her humble meal and food (“caules vel brodium vel spinargia et forte sardineta”) to bring it to Jesus, while she asks to bring her back at least the leftovers. It follows a moral interpretation about the condition of the faithful during Lent, as period of spiritual fight: “nam sumus in campo clauso, scilicet in quadragesima”, if one will resist until the end and win over temptations, there will be also for him/her the spiritual banquet, on Easter, when one is invited to have the Eucharist, i.e. the body of Christ that the Holy Spirit cooked “in coquina uteri virginalis” and that now is hidden under the veil of the Eucharist, “ideo dicit Christus: Vincenti dabo manna absconditum, quod nemo scit nisi qui accipit, Apoc. 2” (possible word play with Ferrer own name?)